Every human body part, each physical aspect of a person, has a mass that correlates with the size of the person. It seems trivially obvious that a five foot tall woman will express the physical characteristics within the range of a five foot tall person. A person standing at 7 feet tall will consistently and predictably have larger body parts than someone of the same sex who is 5 feet tall. This is called height correlation.
Traditional junk science, ever so concerned about the hierarchy of sexuality, tries to support the idea that there is no correlation between height and penis size (mass or length). This is essential because most would natually ask, about data being used to support big or small racial penis propaganda, …doesn’t this study actually correlate larger body parts to people with larger bodies?
(Edit Jan. 14, 2016 to add link…)
Now, I’m just curious here, but has anyone bothered to ask why… out of every human body part, the penis is able to ignore the DNA and the height of the person it was growing on, and settle at a predetermined size, according to the penis possessor’s perceived race instead?
Well of course it doesn’t do that. It sounds absurd because it is absurd. Some random guys made it up. The DNA that makes us up are completely devoid of “racial data.” If you’re inclined still to go with the racist interpretation, I would ask that you analyze the numbers yourself – do not trust in another’s interpretation of the data as scientific fact. See for yourself like they did here…
“The graph below is from a 2006 study published in the Journal of Psychology and Masculinity. It surveyed over 52,000 American men and women on penis size and satisfaction. As you can see from the graph below, penis size is correlated to men’s heights–both measures were self reported in the study. The height to penis size relationship effects are much more dramatic at the extreme ends of height. A man reporting to be very tall (6’4″ or taller) has a three times greater likelihood of having a large penis than a man reporting himself to be very short (5’4″ or shorter). A very tall man also has three times less of a chance of having a small penis than a very short man.”
http://statgasm.com/penis-size-predictors-height-predict-penis-size/
http://www.livescience.com/4489-penis-myths-debunked.
After all, if this racialized penis myth were true, why even bother with a term like “giant dick”? (Giants are not known for their short stature)
Today learned that a few inches in a females vagina, there is no feeling, so technically size doesn’t matter!
(Never really mattered to me as girth is more important ;) )
LikeLiked by 1 person